From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: Drop pointless return statement
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:31:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171123040139.GF4084@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8136755.4DucdONPzh@aspire.rjw.lan>
On 23-11-17, 01:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Drop a pointless return statement from cpufreq_unregister_governor().
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2168,7 +2168,6 @@ void cpufreq_unregister_governor(struct
> mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_mutex);
> list_del(&governor->governor_list);
> mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_mutex);
> - return;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_unregister_governor);
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
--
viresh
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-23 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-23 0:21 [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: Cleanups and governor module removal race fix Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-11-23 0:23 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: Clean up cpufreq_parse_governor() Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-11-23 3:55 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-11-23 0:24 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: Pass policy pointer to cpufreq_parse_governor() Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-11-23 3:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-11-23 0:29 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpufreq: Fix governor module removal race Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-11-23 4:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-11-23 13:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-11-23 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-11-28 2:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-11-23 0:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: Drop pointless return statement Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-11-23 4:01 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171123040139.GF4084@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox