From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [RFC V7 0/2] OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:44:35 +0530 Message-ID: <20171129041435.GG11413@vireshk-i7> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pl0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:41120 "EHLO mail-pl0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751395AbdK2EOj (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 23:14:39 -0500 Received: by mail-pl0-f45.google.com with SMTP id g2so1320579pli.8 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:14:39 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd , robh+dt@kernel.org Cc: Rafael Wysocki , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Nishanth Menon , Vincent Guittot , rnayak@codeaurora.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar , ulf.hansson@linaro.org, Kevin Hilman On 31-10-17, 18:17, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > Now that the performance state of PM domains are supported by the kernel > (merged in linux-next), I am trying once again to define the bindings > which we dropped until the code is merged first. @Rob/Stephen: Can I get Ack from you guys on this series, before I apply them? Ulf has already reviewed these. -- viresh