From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, luca.abeni@santannapisa.it,
claudio@evidence.eu.com, tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it,
bristot@redhat.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
tkjos@android.com, joelaf@google.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com,
alessio.balsini@arm.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: make use of DEADLINE utilization signal
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 11:23:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171204102325.5110-2-juri.lelli@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171204102325.5110-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com>
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
SCHED_DEADLINE tracks active utilization signal with a per dl_rq
variable named running_bw.
Make use of that to drive cpu frequency selection: add up FAIR and
DEADLINE contribution to get the required CPU capacity to handle both
requirements (while RT still selects max frequency).
Co-authored-by: Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
include/linux/sched/cpufreq.h | 2 --
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/sched/cpufreq.h
index d1ad3d825561..0b55834efd46 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/cpufreq.h
@@ -12,8 +12,6 @@
#define SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL (1U << 1)
#define SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT (1U << 2)
-#define SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT_DL (SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT | SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL)
-
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
struct update_util_data {
void (*func)(struct update_util_data *data, u64 time, unsigned int flags);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 2f52ec0f1539..de1ad1fffbdc 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -179,12 +179,17 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy,
static void sugov_get_util(unsigned long *util, unsigned long *max, int cpu)
{
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
- unsigned long cfs_max;
+ unsigned long dl_util = (rq->dl.running_bw * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE)
+ >> BW_SHIFT;
- cfs_max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu);
+ *max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu);
- *util = min(rq->cfs.avg.util_avg, cfs_max);
- *max = cfs_max;
+ /*
+ * Ideally we would like to set util_dl as min/guaranteed freq and
+ * util_cfs + util_dl as requested freq. However, cpufreq is not yet
+ * ready for such an interface. So, we only do the latter for now.
+ */
+ *util = min(rq->cfs.avg.util_avg + dl_util, *max);
}
static void sugov_set_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
@@ -272,7 +277,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
busy = sugov_cpu_is_busy(sg_cpu);
- if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT_DL) {
+ if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT) {
next_f = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
} else {
sugov_get_util(&util, &max, sg_cpu->cpu);
@@ -317,7 +322,7 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time)
j_sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending = false;
continue;
}
- if (j_sg_cpu->flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT_DL)
+ if (j_sg_cpu->flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT)
return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
j_util = j_sg_cpu->util;
@@ -353,7 +358,7 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
sg_cpu->last_update = time;
if (sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time)) {
- if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT_DL)
+ if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT)
next_f = sg_policy->policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
else
next_f = sugov_next_freq_shared(sg_cpu, time);
@@ -383,9 +388,9 @@ static void sugov_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work)
sg_policy = container_of(irq_work, struct sugov_policy, irq_work);
/*
- * For RT and deadline tasks, the schedutil governor shoots the
- * frequency to maximum. Special care must be taken to ensure that this
- * kthread doesn't result in the same behavior.
+ * For RT tasks, the schedutil governor shoots the frequency to maximum.
+ * Special care must be taken to ensure that this kthread doesn't result
+ * in the same behavior.
*
* This is (mostly) guaranteed by the work_in_progress flag. The flag is
* updated only at the end of the sugov_work() function and before that
--
2.14.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-04 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-04 10:23 [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP selection Juri Lelli
2017-12-04 10:23 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2017-12-05 15:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: make use of DEADLINE utilization signal Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-05 15:24 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-05 16:34 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-05 16:40 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-20 12:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-04 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] sched/deadline: move cpu frequency selection triggering points Juri Lelli
2017-12-04 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: make worker kthread be SCHED_DEADLINE Juri Lelli
2017-12-05 11:55 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-05 12:34 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-20 12:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-04 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization signals Juri Lelli
2017-12-05 15:17 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-05 15:26 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-04 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq Juri Lelli
2017-12-04 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] sched/sched.h: remove sd arch_scale_freq_capacity parameter Juri Lelli
2017-12-04 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] sched/sched.h: move arch_scale_{freq,cpu}_capacity outside CONFIG_SMP Juri Lelli
2017-12-04 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] sched/deadline: make bandwidth enforcement scale-invariant Juri Lelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171204102325.5110-2-juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--to=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=alessio.balsini@arm.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).