From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, luca.abeni@santannapisa.it,
claudio@evidence.eu.com, tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it,
bristot@redhat.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
tkjos@android.com, joelaf@google.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com,
alessio.balsini@arm.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 11:23:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171204102325.5110-6-juri.lelli@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171204102325.5110-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com>
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
No assumption can be made upon the rate at which frequency updates get
triggered, as there are scheduling policies (like SCHED_DEADLINE) which
don't trigger them so frequently.
Remove such assumption from the code, by always considering
SCHED_DEADLINE utilization signal as not stale.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
Cc: Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 16 ++++++++++------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index a3072f24dc16..b7a576c8dcaa 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -318,17 +318,21 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time)
s64 delta_ns;
/*
- * If the CPU utilization was last updated before the previous
- * frequency update and the time elapsed between the last update
- * of the CPU utilization and the last frequency update is long
- * enough, don't take the CPU into account as it probably is
- * idle now (and clear iowait_boost for it).
+ * If the CFS CPU utilization was last updated before the
+ * previous frequency update and the time elapsed between the
+ * last update of the CPU utilization and the last frequency
+ * update is long enough, reset iowait_boost and util_cfs, as
+ * they are now probably stale. However, still consider the
+ * CPU contribution if it has some DEADLINE utilization
+ * (util_dl).
*/
delta_ns = time - j_sg_cpu->last_update;
if (delta_ns > TICK_NSEC) {
j_sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
j_sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending = false;
- continue;
+ j_sg_cpu->util_cfs = 0;
+ if (j_sg_cpu->util_dl == 0)
+ continue;
}
if (j_sg_cpu->flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT)
return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
--
2.14.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-04 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-04 10:23 [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP selection Juri Lelli
2017-12-04 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: make use of DEADLINE utilization signal Juri Lelli
2017-12-05 15:09 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-05 15:24 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-05 16:34 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-05 16:40 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-20 12:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-04 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] sched/deadline: move cpu frequency selection triggering points Juri Lelli
2017-12-04 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: make worker kthread be SCHED_DEADLINE Juri Lelli
2017-12-05 11:55 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-05 12:34 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-20 12:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-04 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization signals Juri Lelli
2017-12-05 15:17 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-05 15:26 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-04 10:23 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2017-12-04 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] sched/sched.h: remove sd arch_scale_freq_capacity parameter Juri Lelli
2017-12-04 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] sched/sched.h: move arch_scale_{freq,cpu}_capacity outside CONFIG_SMP Juri Lelli
2017-12-04 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] sched/deadline: make bandwidth enforcement scale-invariant Juri Lelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171204102325.5110-6-juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--to=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=alessio.balsini@arm.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).