From: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] sched/rt: fast switch to maximum frequency when RT tasks are scheduled
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:38:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171206113821.GO31247@e110439-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtCoUVoxhG5mem9fcf30VoQBUCMZr-CLkFVoKRMHr_=btQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Vincent,
On 06-Dec 10:39, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On 30 November 2017 at 12:47, Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> wrote:
[...]
> > static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> > @@ -1564,6 +1564,9 @@ pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
> >
> > p = _pick_next_task_rt(rq);
> >
> > + /* Kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
>
> p is null when there is no rt task to pick.
> You should test this condition before calling cpufreq_update_util
Mmm... for what I see, from the above function's implementation,
_pick_next_task_rt() is always returning a valid pointer to an RT
task.
The above call does a:
p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
right before returning, and there is also a BUG_ON(!rt_se) in the
previous RT tasks scanning loop.
Am I missing something?
> > + cpufreq_update_util(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT);
> > +
> > /* The running task is never eligible for pushing */
> > dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
[...]
> > @@ -2317,6 +2323,9 @@ static void set_curr_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
> >
> > p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
> >
> > + /* Kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
> > + cpufreq_update_util(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT);
>
> Is this change linked to the "- when a task is set to be RT" in the
> commit message ?
>
> I can't see a situation where this is call without the previous one.
> AFAICT, enqueue_task_rt will be called before each call to this
> function
Yeah, you right, in core.c the pattern seems to always be:
if (queued)
enqueue_task()
if (running)
set_curr_task()
I'll remove this chunk from the next version.
>
> > +
> > /* The running task is never eligible for pushing */
> > dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
> > }
Thanks for the review!
--
#include <best/regards.h>
Patrick Bellasi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-06 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-30 11:47 [PATCH v3 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] cpufreq: schedutil: reset sg_cpus's flags at IDLE enter Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:12 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:41 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:02 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 16:19 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:45 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-07 5:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 12:45 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-07 15:55 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-12-12 11:37 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-12 13:38 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-12 14:40 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-12 14:56 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-12 15:18 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-12 15:16 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-13 9:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-20 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 14:51 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ensure max frequency while running RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:17 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:45 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:03 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-07 5:05 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 14:18 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] cpufreq: schedutil: update CFS util only if used Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:22 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:57 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-07 5:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 14:19 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-14 4:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] sched/rt: fast switch to maximum frequency when RT tasks are scheduled Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:28 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-06 9:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-12-06 11:38 ` Patrick Bellasi [this message]
2017-12-06 12:36 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] cpufreq: schedutil: relax rate-limiting while running RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:36 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:54 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:06 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ignore sugov kthreads Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:41 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 16:02 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:12 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 16:42 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-07 9:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 15:47 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-20 15:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 15:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-21 9:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-21 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-21 10:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-21 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-21 10:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-22 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 15:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-31 9:43 ` Claudio Scordino
2018-01-02 13:31 ` Claudio Scordino
2017-12-20 17:38 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-20 18:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 11:02 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:07 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:14 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 12:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:07 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 12:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:27 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:38 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 12:43 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:50 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 13:01 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:25 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-21 7:34 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-02-06 10:55 ` Claudio Scordino
2018-02-06 15:43 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-02-06 18:14 ` Claudio Scordino
2018-02-06 18:36 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-02-08 16:14 ` Claudio Scordino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171206113821.GO31247@e110439-lin \
--to=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox