From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] remove some of unneeded kallsyms includes Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:24:42 -0800 Message-ID: <20171208142442.7c09406d7f0bc3d2c1bfe411@linux-foundation.org> References: <20171208025616.16267-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171208025616.16267-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Michal Hocko , Rafael Wysocki , Len Brown , Bjorn Helgaas , Vlastimil Babka , Tejun Heo , Lai Jiangshan , Thomas Gleixner , Fengguang Wu , Steven Rostedt , Petr Mladek , LKML , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Sergey Senozhatsky List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 11:56:07 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > A small patch set that removes some kallsyms includes > here and there. Mostly those kallsyms includes are leftovers: > printk() gained %pS/%pF modifiers support some time ago, so > print_symbol() and friends became sort of unneeded [along with > print_fn_descriptor_symbol() deprecation], thus some of the > users were converted to pS/pF. This patch set just cleans up > that convertion. > > We still have a number of print_symbol() users [which > must be converted to ps/pf, print_symbol() uses a stack buffer > KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN to do what printk(ps/pf) can do], but this is > out of scope. > > I compile tested the patch set; but, as always and > usual, would be great if 0day build robot double check it. I grabbed everything and shall drop any patches which later turn up in the various subsystem trees.