linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>, Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] cpufreq: schedutil: reset sg_cpus's flags at IDLE enter
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 15:56:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171212145620.GA30887@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171212144019.GQ25177@vireshk-i7>

On 12/12/17 20:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12-12-17, 14:38, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Hi Viresh,
> > 
> > On 12/12/17 17:07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > > Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 15:43:26 +0530
> > > Subject: [PATCH] sched: Keep track of cpufreq utilization update flags
> > > 
> > > Currently the schedutil governor overwrites the sg_cpu->flags field on
> > > every call to the utilization handler. It was pretty good as the initial
> > > implementation of utilization handlers, there are several drawbacks
> > > though.
> > > 
> > > The biggest drawback is that the sg_cpu->flags field doesn't always
> > > represent the correct type of tasks that are enqueued on a CPU's rq. For
> > > example, if a fair task is enqueued while a RT or DL task is running, we
> > > will overwrite the flags with value 0 and that may take the CPU to lower
> > > OPPs unintentionally. There can be other corner cases as well which we
> > > aren't aware of currently.
> > > 
> > > This patch changes the current implementation to keep track of all the
> > > task types that are currently enqueued to the CPUs rq. There are two
> > > flags for every scheduling class now, one to set the flag and other one
> > > to clear it. The flag is set by the scheduling classes from the existing
> > > set of calls to cpufreq_update_util(), and the flag is cleared when the
> > > last task of the scheduling class is dequeued. For now, the util update
> > > handlers return immediately if they were called to clear the flag.
> > > 
> > > We can add more optimizations over this patch separately.
> > > 
> > > The last parameter of sugov_set_iowait_boost() is also dropped as the
> > > function can get it from sg_cpu anyway.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > @@ -655,7 +669,7 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > >  		memset(sg_cpu, 0, sizeof(*sg_cpu));
> > >  		sg_cpu->cpu = cpu;
> > >  		sg_cpu->sg_policy = sg_policy;
> > > -		sg_cpu->flags = SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT;
> > > +		sg_cpu->flags = 0;
> > >  		sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> > >  	}
> > 
> > Why this change during initialization?
> 
> Firstly I am not sure why it was set to SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT, as schedutil wouldn't
> change the frequency until the first time the util handler is called. And once
> that is called we were updating the flag anyway. So, unless I misunderstood its
> purpose, it was doing anything helpful.

That was actually my understanding as well. Your patch made me notice
it.

> 
> I need to remove it otherwise the RT flag may remain set for a very long time
> unnecessarily. That would be until the time the last RT task is not dequeued.
> Consider this for example: we are at max freq when sugov_start() is called and
> it sets the RT flag, but there is no RT task to run. Now, we have tons of CFS
> tasks but we always keep running at max because of the flag. Even the schedutil
> RT thread doesn't get a chance to run/deququed, because we never want a freq
> change with the RT flag and stay at max.
> 
> Makes sense ?

Yes. I guess it's working ok for now because of the problem this patch,
and Patrick's, address (always overwriting).

Thanks,

- Juri

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-12 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-30 11:47 [PATCH v3 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] cpufreq: schedutil: reset sg_cpus's flags at IDLE enter Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:12   ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:41     ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:02       ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 16:19         ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:45           ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-07  5:01   ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 12:45     ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-07 15:55       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-12-12 11:37       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-12 13:38         ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-12 14:40           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-12 14:56             ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2017-12-12 15:18               ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-12 15:16         ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-13  9:06           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-20 14:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 14:51     ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ensure max frequency while running RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:17   ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:45     ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:03       ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-07  5:05   ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 14:18     ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] cpufreq: schedutil: update CFS util only if used Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:22   ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:57     ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-07  5:15       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 14:19         ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-14  4:45           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] sched/rt: fast switch to maximum frequency when RT tasks are scheduled Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:28   ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-06  9:39   ` Vincent Guittot
2017-12-06 11:38     ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-06 12:36       ` Vincent Guittot
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] cpufreq: schedutil: relax rate-limiting while running RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:36   ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:54     ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:06       ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ignore sugov kthreads Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:41   ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 16:02     ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:12       ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 16:42         ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-07  9:24           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 15:47             ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-20 15:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 15:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-21  9:15     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-21 10:25       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-21 10:30         ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-21 10:39           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-21 10:43             ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-22  8:30               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 15:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-31  9:43     ` Claudio Scordino
2018-01-02 13:31       ` Claudio Scordino
2017-12-20 17:38   ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-20 18:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 10:06     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 11:02       ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 11:46         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:07           ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:14             ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 12:22               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:07           ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 12:19             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:27               ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:38               ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 12:43                 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:50                   ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 13:01                     ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:10           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:25             ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-21  7:34   ` Viresh Kumar
2018-02-06 10:55   ` Claudio Scordino
2018-02-06 15:43     ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-02-06 18:14       ` Claudio Scordino
2018-02-06 18:36         ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-02-08 16:14           ` Claudio Scordino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171212145620.GA30887@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).