linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
	tkjos@android.com, joelaf@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Don't call sugov_get_util() unnecessarily
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:34:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171213113435.GF30887@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7b0698a61bcb959704f58dbabe8c70d657210301.1513158452.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Hi,

On 13/12/17 15:23, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> sugov_update_shared() may get called to clear the scheduling class flags
> and we would return immediately in that case. Calling sugov_get_util()
> in that case isn't going to be of any use then. Move invocation of
> sugov_get_util() after the clear flag is checked.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index 7edfdc59ee8f..b69c37c867fe 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -349,8 +349,6 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
>  	unsigned long util, max;
>  	unsigned int next_f;
>  
> -	sugov_get_util(&util, &max, sg_cpu->cpu);
> -
>  	raw_spin_lock(&sg_policy->update_lock);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_CLEAR)) {
> @@ -358,6 +356,8 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
>  		goto unlock;
>  	}
>  
> +	sugov_get_util(&util, &max, sg_cpu->cpu);
> +
>  	sg_cpu->util = util;
>  	sg_cpu->max = max;
>  	sg_cpu->flags |= flags;

It seems that Patrick already posted basically the same change:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10084669/

Also, Cc-ing him for this.. I just noticed he wasn't Cc-ed to the series.

Best,

- Juri

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-13 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-13  9:53 [PATCH 0/4] sched: cpufreq: Track util update flags Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13  9:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Initialize sg_cpu->flags to 0 Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13 11:13   ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-13 11:22     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13  9:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: cpufreq: Keep track of cpufreq utilization update flags Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13 11:26   ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-13 11:29     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-16 16:40   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-16 16:47     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-17  0:19       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-18  4:59         ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-18 11:35           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-18 11:59             ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-18 12:14               ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-19  3:12                 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-19  3:18                   ` Joel Fernandes
2017-12-19  3:22                     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-19  3:26                       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-19  3:30                         ` Joel Fernandes
2017-12-19  3:41                           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-19 10:44                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-18 17:34               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-19 19:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20  4:04     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-20  8:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20  8:48         ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-20  9:17           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 12:55         ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-20 13:28           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 14:31             ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-20 14:52               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-20 15:01                 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-20 14:47             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-20 14:51               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 17:27               ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-20 18:17                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-13  9:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Don't pass flags to sugov_set_iowait_boost() Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13 11:28   ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-13  9:53 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Don't call sugov_get_util() unnecessarily Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13 11:34   ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2017-12-13 12:02     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-19  3:26   ` Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171213113435.GF30887@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).