From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juri Lelli Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: cpufreq: Keep track of cpufreq utilization update flags Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 18:27:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20171220172717.GB22246@localhost.localdomain> References: <20171220125546.GI19821@e110439-lin> <20171220132826.kcu5zqkva5h6nmfk@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <5156588.pkDhmtr2np@aspire.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5156588.pkDhmtr2np@aspire.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Patrick Bellasi , Viresh Kumar , Ingo Molnar , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot , dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, tkjos@android.com, joelaf@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 20/12/17 15:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 2:28:26 PM CET Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:55:46PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > > On 20-Dec 09:31, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > Didn't juri have patches to make DL do something sane? But yes, I think > > > > those flags are part of the problem. > > > > > > He recently reposted them here: > > > > > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171204102325.5110-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com > > > > Yeah, just found them and actually munged them into my queue; did all > > the modifications you suggested too. Lets see if it comes apart. > > Good, because I think that the Juri's patches should go in first. > Thanks Peter for taking the patches. I was actually waiting for the flag thing to be resolved to post again. :/ Anyway, let us know how it goes and if I need to make further changes. Best, - Juri