From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] PM / OPP: Make local function ti_opp_supply_set_opp() static Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:17:50 +0530 Message-ID: <20171221054750.GA19815@vireshk-i7> References: <1513748680-163750-1-git-send-email-weiyongjun1@huawei.com> <20171220054202.GU19815@vireshk-i7> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pl0-f68.google.com ([209.85.160.68]:33155 "EHLO mail-pl0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750757AbdLUFry (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:47:54 -0500 Received: by mail-pl0-f68.google.com with SMTP id 1so8972471plv.0 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 21:47:54 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Wei Yongjun , Dave Gerlach , Viresh Kumar , Nishanth Menon , Stephen Boyd , Linux PM , "Rafael J. Wysocki" On 21-12-17, 02:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > +Dave/Rafael, > > > > On 20-12-17, 05:44, Wei Yongjun wrote: > >> Fixes the following sparse warning: > >> > >> drivers/opp/ti-opp-supply.c:276:5: warning: > >> symbol 'ti_opp_supply_set_opp' was not declared. Should it be static? > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun > >> --- > >> drivers/opp/ti-opp-supply.c | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/opp/ti-opp-supply.c b/drivers/opp/ti-opp-supply.c > >> index 44dae3e..370eff3 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/opp/ti-opp-supply.c > >> +++ b/drivers/opp/ti-opp-supply.c > >> @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static int _opp_set_voltage(struct device *dev, > >> * > >> * Return: If successful, 0, else appropriate error value. > >> */ > >> -int ti_opp_supply_set_opp(struct dev_pm_set_opp_data *data) > >> +static int ti_opp_supply_set_opp(struct dev_pm_set_opp_data *data) > >> { > >> struct dev_pm_opp_supply *old_supply_vdd = &data->old_opp.supplies[0]; > >> struct dev_pm_opp_supply *old_supply_vbb = &data->old_opp.supplies[1]; > > > > Maybe this should be folded to the original patch ? > > That is against the latest series from Dave, right? > > I can apply it. Yes. -- viresh