From: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>, Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 11:02:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171222110206.GA6414@e110439-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171222100626.7g5yklspjofcp2we@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 22-Dec 11:06, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 06:38:14PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > On 20/12/17 16:30, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > @@ -327,12 +331,7 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shar
> > > if (delta_ns > TICK_NSEC) {
> > > j_sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
> > > j_sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending = false;
> > > - j_sg_cpu->util_cfs = 0;
> > > - if (j_sg_cpu->util_dl == 0)
> > > - continue;
> > > }
> >
> > This goes away because with Brendan/Vincent fix we don't need the
> > workaround for stale CFS util contribution for idle CPUs anymore?
>
> An easy fix would be something like the below I suppose (also folded a
> change from Viresh).
>
> This way it completely ignores the demand from idle CPUs. Which I
> suppose is exactly what you want, no?
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index ab84d2261554..9736b537386a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -315,8 +315,8 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time)
> unsigned long j_util, j_max;
> s64 delta_ns;
>
> - if (j_sg_cpu != sg_cpu)
> - sugov_get_util(j_sg_cpu);
> + if (idle_cpu(j))
> + continue;
That should work to skip IDLE CPUs... however I'm missing where now we
get the sugov_get_util(j_sg_cpu) for active CPUs. It has been moved
somewhere else I guess...
Moreover, that way don't we completely disregard CFS blocked load for
IDLE CPUs... as well as DL reserved utilization, which should be
released only at the 0-lag time?
>
> /*
> * If the CFS CPU utilization was last updated before the
> @@ -354,7 +354,6 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
>
> raw_spin_lock(&sg_policy->update_lock);
>
> - sugov_get_util(sg_cpu);
> sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
> sg_cpu->last_update = time;
>
--
#include <best/regards.h>
Patrick Bellasi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-22 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-30 11:47 [PATCH v3 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] cpufreq: schedutil: reset sg_cpus's flags at IDLE enter Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:12 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:41 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:02 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 16:19 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:45 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-07 5:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 12:45 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-07 15:55 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-12-12 11:37 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-12 13:38 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-12 14:40 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-12 14:56 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-12 15:18 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-12 15:16 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-13 9:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-20 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 14:51 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ensure max frequency while running RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:17 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:45 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:03 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-07 5:05 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 14:18 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] cpufreq: schedutil: update CFS util only if used Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:22 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:57 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-07 5:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 14:19 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-14 4:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] sched/rt: fast switch to maximum frequency when RT tasks are scheduled Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:28 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-06 9:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-12-06 11:38 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-06 12:36 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] cpufreq: schedutil: relax rate-limiting while running RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:36 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:54 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:06 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ignore sugov kthreads Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:41 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 16:02 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:12 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 16:42 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-07 9:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 15:47 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-20 15:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 15:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-21 9:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-21 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-21 10:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-21 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-21 10:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-22 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 15:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-31 9:43 ` Claudio Scordino
2018-01-02 13:31 ` Claudio Scordino
2017-12-20 17:38 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-20 18:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 11:02 ` Patrick Bellasi [this message]
2017-12-22 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:07 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:14 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 12:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:07 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 12:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:27 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:38 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 12:43 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:50 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 13:01 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:25 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-21 7:34 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-02-06 10:55 ` Claudio Scordino
2018-02-06 15:43 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-02-06 18:14 ` Claudio Scordino
2018-02-06 18:36 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-02-08 16:14 ` Claudio Scordino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171222110206.GA6414@e110439-lin \
--to=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).