From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ognjen =?utf-8?B?R2FsacSH?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/4] pm: add to_power_supply macro to the API Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 13:54:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20171231125450.GA2442@thinkpad> References: <20171223105316.GA4352@thinkpad> <1514591385.9667.0.camel@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Robert Moore , Lv Zheng , ACPI Devel Maling List , devel@acpica.org, Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , Sebastian Reichel , Platform Driver , ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Linux PM , Christoph =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=F6hmwalder?= , Kevin Locke List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 02:40:41PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Andy Shevchenko > > wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Ognjen Galić wrote: > > >> You definitely need to send a new revision with all comments > >> addressed. So far you didn't responce to them which I recognize as > >> total agreement that they have to be addressed. > > > > I asked for not sending new versions before I have a chance to look at > > the current one in detail, but enough time has passed after the last > > one, so I agree. Sending a new version at this point won't hurt. :-) > > Thanks, Rafael, for clarification, that's exactly what I kept in mind > when proposing a new version (I'm concerned as well of frequency of > patch series to be not so high). > Well guys hold on tight, another patch revision is incoming: #11. Oh, and by the way, happy new year! > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko