From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] thermal: Add cooling device's statistics in sysfs
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 10:16:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180115044616.GC22978@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180112174606.GA11076@localhost.localdomain>
On 12-01-18, 09:46, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 03:06:09PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > $ ls -R /sys/class/thermal/cooling_device0/
> > /sys/class/thermal/cooling_device0/:
> > cur_state max_state power stats subsystem type uevent
> >
> > /sys/class/thermal/cooling_device0/power:
> > autosuspend_delay_ms runtime_active_time runtime_suspended_time
> > control runtime_status
> >
> > /sys/class/thermal/cooling_device0/stats:
> > reset time_in_state_ms total_trans
> >
>
> I guess the only missing node from the cpufreq design copy was the
> transition table.
I don't think it would be very useful here and so didn't add it.
> Also, I think the stats per thermal zone is also useful, sometimes
> more than per cooling device, as I have been using in
> the past, but that is just a comment, not really to block your patch.
Sure, that can be added in a separate patch. What kind of stats are you
expecting there ?
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c
> > index 8cdf75adcce1..eb03d7e099bb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c
> > @@ -187,7 +187,10 @@ void thermal_cdev_update(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
> > if (instance->target > target)
> > target = instance->target;
> > }
> > - cdev->ops->set_cur_state(cdev, target);
> > +
> > + if (!cdev->ops->set_cur_state(cdev, target))
> > + thermal_cooling_device_stats_update(cdev, target);
> > +
>
> I might be wrong but, this will maybe double account for cases the same
> cooling state is selected.
No because I am exiting early for same sates in that routine.
> > void thermal_cooling_device_setup_sysfs(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
> > {
> > + struct cooling_dev_stats *stats;
> > + unsigned long states;
> > + int ret, size;
> > +
> > + ret = cdev->ops->get_max_state(cdev, &states);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + states++; /* Total number of states is highest state + 1 */
> > + size = sizeof(*stats);
> > + size += sizeof(*stats->time_in_state) * states;
> > +
> > + stats = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!stats)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + stats->time_in_state = (ktime_t *)(stats + 1);
> > + cdev->stats = stats;
> > + stats->last_time = ktime_get();
> > + stats->max_states = states;
> > + cdev->stats = stats;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_init(&stats->lock);
>
> I would say, the cooling device stat initialization deserves its own
> initialization function, don't you think?
Hmm, I am not sure if we need it right away. This function is only for cooling
device's sysfs setup and initializing the "stats" structure kind of falls in the
setup category. Of course if we want this function to handle sysfs setup for
thermal zones as well, then yes we better split it up.
The other thing was with thermal_cooling_device_remove_sysfs() as that would
also need to call a separate routine to do the cleanup and that would be the
only thing it will end up doing. So it would more be like a dummy caller.
> Also, I see nothing about sysfs on the lines added to
> thermal_cooling_device_setup_sysfs().
Well, it is allocating structure to keep the values showed while reading sysfs
files, so it is kind of sysfs related to me :)
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-15 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-11 9:36 [PATCH V3] thermal: Add cooling device's statistics in sysfs Viresh Kumar
2018-01-12 11:09 ` Aishwarya Pant
2018-01-12 17:25 ` Eduardo Valentin
2018-01-12 17:46 ` Eduardo Valentin
2018-01-15 4:46 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2018-01-15 16:32 ` Eduardo Valentin
2018-01-16 8:44 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-01-16 10:00 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180115044616.GC22978@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).