From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: AMD: Ignore the check for ProcFeedback in ST/CZ Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 16:12:51 +0530 Message-ID: <20180118104251.GJ3012@vireshk-i7> References: <1516270890-1224-1-git-send-email-akshu.agrawal@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f65.google.com ([74.125.83.65]:40103 "EHLO mail-pg0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754617AbeARKmy (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jan 2018 05:42:54 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f65.google.com with SMTP id g16so7166196pgn.7 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 02:42:54 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1516270890-1224-1-git-send-email-akshu.agrawal@amd.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Akshu Agrawal Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, satyajit.sahu@amd.com On 18-01-18, 15:51, Akshu Agrawal wrote: > In ST/CZ CPUID 8000_0007_EDX[11, ProcFeedbackInterface] is 0, > but the mechanism is still available and can be used. > > Signed-off-by: Akshu Agrawal > --- > drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c | 11 +++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c > index 042023bbbf62..be926d9a66e5 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -109,12 +110,18 @@ static unsigned int amd_powersave_bias_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > static int __init amd_freq_sensitivity_init(void) > { > u64 val; > + struct pci_dev *pcidev; > > if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD) > return -ENODEV; > > - if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PROC_FEEDBACK)) > - return -ENODEV; > + pcidev = pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, > + PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_KERNCZ_SMBUS, NULL); > + > + if (!pcidev) { > + if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PROC_FEEDBACK)) > + return -ENODEV; > + } > > if (rdmsrl_safe(MSR_AMD64_FREQ_SENSITIVITY_ACTUAL, &val)) > return -ENODEV; Acked-by: Viresh Kumar -- viresh