From: Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] sched/fair: use util_est in LB and WU paths
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:03:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180125143358.GE30677@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180124193138.GB5739@e110439-lin>
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 07:31:38PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
>
> > > + /*
> > > + * These are the main cases covered:
> > > + * - if *p is the only task sleeping on this CPU, then:
> > > + * cpu_util (== task_util) > util_est (== 0)
> > > + * and thus we return:
> > > + * cpu_util_wake = (cpu_util - task_util) = 0
> > > + *
> > > + * - if other tasks are SLEEPING on the same CPU, which is just waking
> > > + * up, then:
> > > + * cpu_util >= task_util
> > > + * cpu_util > util_est (== 0)
> > > + * and thus we discount *p's blocked utilization to return:
> > > + * cpu_util_wake = (cpu_util - task_util) >= 0
> > > + *
> > > + * - if other tasks are RUNNABLE on that CPU and
> > > + * util_est > cpu_util
> > > + * then we use util_est since it returns a more restrictive
> > > + * estimation of the spare capacity on that CPU, by just considering
> > > + * the expected utilization of tasks already runnable on that CPU.
> > > + */
> > > + util_est = cpu_rq(cpu)->cfs.util_est_runnable;
> > > + util = max(util, util_est);
> > > +
> > > + return util;
>
> I should instead clamp util before returning it! ;-)
>
> > May be a separate patch to remove the clamping part?
>
> No, I think we should keep cpu_util_wake clamped to not affect the existing
> call sites. I just need to remove it where not needed (done) and add it where
> needed (will do on the next iteration).
cpu_util_wake() is called only from capacity_spare_wake(). There are no other
callsites. The capacity_spare_wake() is clamping the return value of
cpu_util_wake() to CPU capacity. The clamping is not needed, I think.
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-25 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-23 18:08 [PATCH v3 0/3] Utilization estimation (util_est) for FAIR tasks Patrick Bellasi
2018-01-23 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] sched/fair: add util_est on top of PELT Patrick Bellasi
2018-01-24 16:40 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-01-24 19:16 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-01-24 22:06 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-01-29 16:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 12:46 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-01-30 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 14:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-05 17:49 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-01-23 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] sched/fair: use util_est in LB and WU paths Patrick Bellasi
2018-01-24 11:33 ` Pavan Kondeti
2018-01-24 19:31 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-01-25 14:33 ` Pavan Kondeti [this message]
2018-01-31 15:32 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-01-23 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: use util_est for OPP selection Patrick Bellasi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180125143358.GE30677@codeaurora.org \
--to=pkondeti@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=smuckle@google.com \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).