From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] cpufreq: schedutil: rate limits for SCHED_DEADLINE Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:45:06 +0530 Message-ID: <20180313111506.GC15832@vireshk-i7> References: <1520937340-2755-1-git-send-email-claudio@evidence.eu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1520937340-2755-1-git-send-email-claudio@evidence.eu.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Claudio Scordino Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Patrick Bellasi , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 13-03-18, 11:35, Claudio Scordino wrote: > When the SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class increases the CPU utilization, > we should not wait for the rate limit, otherwise we may miss some > deadline. > > Tests using rt-app on Exynos5422 with up to 10 SCHED_DEADLINE tasks have > shown reductions of even 10% of deadline misses with a negligible > increase of energy consumption (measured through Baylibre Cape). > > Signed-off-by: Claudio Scordino > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar > Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > CC: Rafael J. Wysocki > CC: Viresh Kumar > CC: Patrick Bellasi > CC: Dietmar Eggemann > CC: Morten Rasmussen > CC: Juri Lelli > CC: Vincent Guittot > CC: Todd Kjos > CC: Joel Fernandes > CC: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org > CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > --- > Changes from v3: > - Specific routine renamed as ignore_dl_rate_limit() LGTM. Thanks. -- viresh