From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH v5 6/7] cpuidle: menu: Refine idle state selection for running tick Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:45:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20180319094549.GG4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <2142751.3U6XgWyF8u@aspire.rjw.lan> <4980385.RayypyZ8dA@aspire.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4980385.RayypyZ8dA@aspire.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux PM , Frederic Weisbecker , Thomas Gleixner , Paul McKenney , Thomas Ilsche , Doug Smythies , Rik van Riel , Aubrey Li , Mike Galbraith , LKML List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:16:41PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > --- linux-pm.orig/kernel/time/tick-sched.c > +++ linux-pm/kernel/time/tick-sched.c > @@ -1031,10 +1031,11 @@ void tick_nohz_irq_exit(void) > > /** > * tick_nohz_get_sleep_length - return the expected length of the current sleep > + * @cur_ret: pointer for returning the current time to the next event Both name and description are confusing, what it actually appears to return is the duration until the next event. Which would suggest a name like: delta_next or something along those lines. But 'cur' short for current, is very misleading.