From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
kevin.wangtao@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
amit.kachhap@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
javi.merino@kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/7] CPU cooling device new strategies
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 22:30:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180326143046.GA18782@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180308120352.mko2b775ppquverb@oak.lan>
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 12:03:52PM +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 07:57:17PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > >> The preliminary benchmarks show the following changes:
> > >>
> > >> On the hikey6220, dhrystone shows a throughtput increase of 40% for an
> > >> increase of the latency of 16% while sysbench shows a latency increase
> > >> of 5%.
> > >
> > > I don't follow these numbers. Throughput increase while injecting idle?
> > > compared to what? percentages of what? Please be more specific to better
> > > describer your work..
> >
> > The dhrystone throughput is based on the virtual timer, when we are
> > running, it is at max opp, so the throughput increases. But regarding
> > the real time, it takes obviously more time to achieve as we are
> > artificially inserting idle cycles. With the cpufreq governor, we run at
> > a lower opp, so the throughput is less for dhrystone but it takes less
> > time to achieve.
> >
> > Percentages are comparing cpufreq vs cpuidle cooling devices. I will
> > take care of presenting the results in a more clear way in the next version.
>
> I think we should also note that the current hikey settings for cpufreq
> are very badly tuned for this platform. It has a single temp threshold
> and it jumps from max freq to min freq.
>
> IIRC Leo's work on Hikey thermals correctly it would be much better if
> it used the power-allocator thermal governor or if if copied some of
> the Samsung 32-bit platform by configuring the step governor with a
> graduated with a slightly lower threshold that moves two stops back in
> the OPP table (which is still fairly high clock speed... but it
> thermally sustainable).
I think Daniel L. is working on this patch set with 'power-allocator'
governor, and the parameters 'sustainable-power = <3326>' and
'dynamic-power-coefficient = <311>' are profiling value on Hikey
platform. Now we only consider dynamic power and skip static leakage
for 'power-allocator' governor. And all these parameters are merged
into Linux mainline kernel.
Daniel L. could correct me if I misunderstand the testing conditions.
Thanks,
Leo Yan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-26 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1519226968-19821-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
[not found] ` <1519226968-19821-6-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
2018-03-06 23:19 ` [PATCH V2 5/7] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Add idle cooling device documentation Pavel Machek
2018-03-07 11:42 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-03-08 8:59 ` Pavel Machek
2018-03-08 11:54 ` Daniel Thompson
2018-03-07 17:09 ` [PATCH V2 0/7] CPU cooling device new strategies Eduardo Valentin
2018-03-07 18:57 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-03-08 12:03 ` Daniel Thompson
2018-03-26 14:30 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2018-03-27 9:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <1519226968-19821-7-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
2018-03-27 2:03 ` [PATCH V2 6/7] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Introduce the cpu idle cooling driver Leo Yan
2018-03-27 10:26 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-03-27 12:28 ` Juri Lelli
2018-03-27 12:31 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-03-27 13:08 ` Juri Lelli
2018-03-27 3:35 ` Leo Yan
2018-03-27 10:56 ` Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <20180223073432.GF26947@vireshk-i7>
[not found] ` <faaf027c-e01c-6801-9a0c-ab7e0ba669a1@linaro.org>
2018-02-26 4:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-03-13 19:15 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-04 8:50 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-05 4:49 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-03-27 3:43 ` Leo Yan
2018-03-27 11:10 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180326143046.GA18782@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s \
--to=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=javi.merino@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.wangtao@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox