From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq/schedutil: Cleanup and document iowait boost
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 16:26:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180410105606.GH7671@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180410104349.GE14248@e110439-lin>
On 10-04-18, 11:43, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> On 05-Apr 15:28, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> What about this new version for the two functions,
> just compile tested:
>
> ---8<---
>
> static void sugov_set_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
> unsigned int flags)
> {
> bool iowait = flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT;
>
> /* Reset boost if the CPU appears to have been idle enough */
> if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost) {
> s64 delta_ns = time - sg_cpu->last_update;
>
> if (delta_ns > TICK_NSEC) {
> sg_cpu->iowait_boost = iowait
> ? sg_cpu->sg_policy->policy->min : 0;
Yeah, I see you are trying to optimize it a bit here but this makes
things more confusing I would say :)
I would just set iowait_boost to 0 and drop the return; from below and
let the code fall through and reach the end of this routine.
> sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending = iowait;
> return;
> }
> }
>
> /* Boost only tasks waking up after IO */
> if (!iowait)
> return;
>
> /* Ensure IO boost doubles only one time at each frequency increase */
> if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending)
> return;
> sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending = true;
>
> /* Double the IO boost at each frequency increase */
> if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost) {
> sg_cpu->iowait_boost <<= 1;
> if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost > sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max)
> sg_cpu->iowait_boost = sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max;
> return;
> }
>
> /* At first wakeup after IO, start with minimum boost */
> sg_cpu->iowait_boost = sg_cpu->sg_policy->policy->min;
> }
>
> static void sugov_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu,
> unsigned long *util, unsigned long *max)
> {
> unsigned int boost_util, boost_max;
>
> /* No IOWait boost active */
> if (!sg_cpu->iowait_boost)
> return;
>
> /* An IO waiting task has just woken up, use the boost value */
> if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending) {
> sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending = false;
> } else {
> /* Reduce the boost value otherwise */
> sg_cpu->iowait_boost >>= 1;
> if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost < sg_cpu->sg_policy->policy->min) {
> sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
> return;
> }
> }
>
> boost_util = sg_cpu->iowait_boost;
> boost_max = sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max;
>
> /*
> * A CPU is boosted only if its current utilization is smaller then
> * the current IO boost level.
> */
> if (*util * boost_max < *max * boost_util) {
> *util = boost_util;
> *max = boost_max;
> }
> }
So this is quite different than what you proposed, it is only fixing
the existing problem which I pointed out to. Looks fine, not much
changed really from the current state of code.
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-10 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-28 9:07 [PATCH] cpufreq/schedutil: Cleanup and document iowait boost Patrick Bellasi
2018-04-05 9:58 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-04-10 10:43 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-04-10 10:56 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2018-04-10 11:57 ` Patrick Bellasi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180410105606.GH7671@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=smuckle@google.com \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox