From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add a --strict test for structs with bool member definitions Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 09:47:19 +0200 Message-ID: <20180412074719.pmcddramzyikppco@gmail.com> References: <20180410123305.GF4082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <95477c93db187bab6da8a8ba7c57836868446179.camel@perches.com> <20180410143950.4b8526073b4e3e34689f68cb@linux-foundation.org> <20180410150011.df9e036f57b5bcac7ac19686@linux-foundation.org> <20180411081502.GJ4082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20180411092959.e666ec443e4d3bb6f43901d7@linux-foundation.org> <20180411170049.GR4082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180411170049.GR4082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Andrew Morton , Joe Perches , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andy Whitcroft , yuankuiz@codeaurora.org, Linux PM , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Frederic Weisbecker , Thomas Gleixner , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Len Brown , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > I still have room in my /dev/null mailbox for pure checkpatch patches. > > > (ooh, https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/21/384 is working this morning) > > Yes, we really should not use lkml.org for references. Sadly google > displays it very prominently when you search for something. lkml.org is nice in emails that have a short expected life time and relevance - but it probably shouldn't be used for permanent references such as kernel messages, code comments and Git log entries. Thanks, Ingo