From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Quentin Perret Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] sched: Introduce energy models of CPUs Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 09:37:31 +0100 Message-ID: <20180413083730.GA3470@e108498-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20180406153607.17815-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> <20180406153607.17815-3-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> <20180413040253.GW7671@vireshk-i7> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180413040253.GW7671@vireshk-i7> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Dietmar Eggemann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Thara Gopinath , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Morten Rasmussen , Chris Redpath , Patrick Bellasi , Valentin Schneider , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Vincent Guittot , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes , Juri Lelli , Steve Muckle , Eduardo Valentin List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Friday 13 Apr 2018 at 09:32:53 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote: [...] > And for the whole OPP discussion, perhaps we should have another > architecture specific callback which the scheduler can call to get a > ready-made energy model with all the structures filled in. That way > the OPP specific stuff will move to the architecture specific > callback. Yes, that's another possible solution indeed. Actually, it's already on the list of ideas to be dicussed in OSPM ;-) Thanks, Quentin