From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] sched/core: uclamp: add CPU clamp groups accounting Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 10:40:19 +0200 Message-ID: <20180413084019.GQ4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180409165615.2326-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20180409165615.2326-2-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180409165615.2326-2-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Patrick Bellasi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Tejun Heo , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Vincent Guittot , Paul Turner , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Joel Fernandes , Steve Muckle List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 05:56:09PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > +static inline void init_uclamp(void) WTH is that inline? > +{ > + struct uclamp_cpu *uc_cpu; > + int clamp_id; > + int cpu; > + > + mutex_init(&uclamp_mutex); > + > + for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id) { > + /* Init CPU's clamp groups */ > + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { > + uc_cpu = &cpu_rq(cpu)->uclamp[clamp_id]; > + memset(uc_cpu, UCLAMP_NONE, sizeof(struct uclamp_cpu)); > + } > + } Those loops are the wrong way around, this shreds your cache. This is a slow path so it doesn't much matter, but it is sloppy. > +}