From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/2] regulator: bd9571mwv: Add support for toggle power switches Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 22:13:56 +0200 Message-ID: <20180419201356.GC25034@amd> References: <1521026785-26456-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20180418140041.GD10061@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180418140041.GD10061@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Marek Vasut , Liam Girdwood , Linux PM list , Linux-Renesas , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed 2018-04-18 15:00:41, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 03:29:36PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >=20 > > Any comments/suggestions? >=20 > > In case you lost the patches from the thread: > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-renesas-soc/msg24955.html >=20 > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time > for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so=20 > on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) > please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been > review comments then people may be waiting for those to be If I follow the logs right, there was one month before ping. That seems pretty reasonable time. > Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at > all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed Yep, and sending content free complains about pings also adds to the main volume :-(. Anyway, last time I sent you a patch... you _had_ time to complain that I'm pinging too often, but you apparently did not have time to look at the patch. That patch would have been in time for v4.16-rc1 IIRC. Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlrY+IQACgkQMOfwapXb+vLzqgCeL7ZTf7fKhjiIrRwjNAwROwiz kdsAni5RaYPZ16cP2+bhWpf5juj0RsL5 =aa5D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr--