From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched/fair: util_est: update before schedutil Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 17:34:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20180510153420.GG12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180510150553.28122-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20180510150553.28122-3-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180510150553.28122-3-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Patrick Bellasi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Joel Fernandes , Steve Muckle List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 04:05:52PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > index 1f6a23a5b451..01dfc47541e6 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > @@ -5356,6 +5356,9 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) > struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq; > struct sched_entity *se = &p->se; > > + /* Estimated utilization must be updated before schedutil */ > + util_est_enqueue(&rq->cfs, p); Please clarify the comment with a reason; because I'm sure that the next time I see that comment, I'll go 'but why again!?'. > /* > * If in_iowait is set, the code below may not trigger any cpufreq > * utilization updates, so do it here explicitly with the IOWAIT flag