linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, bp@suse.de,
	lenb@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, mgorman@techsingularity.net
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org, juri.lelli@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 07/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: HWP boost performance on busy task migrate
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 21:49:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180516044911.28797-8-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180516044911.28797-1-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>

When a busy task migrates to a new CPU boost HWP prformance to max. This
helps workloads on servers with per core P-states, which saturates all
CPUs and then they migrate frequently. But changing limits has extra over
head of issuing new HWP Request MSR, which takes 1000+
cycles. So this change limits setting HWP Request MSR.
Rate control in setting HWP Requests:
- If the current performance is around P1, simply ignore.
- Once set wait till hold time, till remove boost. While the boost
 is on, another flags is notified, it will prolong boost.
- The task migrates needs to have some utilzation which is more
than threshold utilization, which will trigger P-state above minimum.

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index d418265..ec455af 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ struct global_params {
  *			defines callback and arguments
  * @hwp_boost_active:	HWP performance is boosted on this CPU
  * @last_io_update:	Last time when IO wake flag was set
+ * @migrate_hint:	Set when scheduler indicates thread migration
  *
  * This structure stores per CPU instance data for all CPUs.
  */
@@ -263,6 +264,7 @@ struct cpudata {
 	call_single_data_t csd;
 	bool hwp_boost_active;
 	u64 last_io_update;
+	bool migrate_hint;
 };
 
 static struct cpudata **all_cpu_data;
@@ -1438,6 +1440,8 @@ static int hwp_boost_hold_time_ms = 3;
 #define BOOST_PSTATE_THRESHOLD	(SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE / 2)
 static int hwp_boost_pstate_threshold = BOOST_PSTATE_THRESHOLD;
 
+static int hwp_boost_threshold_busy_pct;
+
 static inline bool intel_pstate_check_boost_threhold(struct cpudata *cpu)
 {
 	/*
@@ -1450,12 +1454,32 @@ static inline bool intel_pstate_check_boost_threhold(struct cpudata *cpu)
 	return true;
 }
 
+static inline int intel_pstate_get_sched_util(struct cpudata *cpu)
+{
+	unsigned long util_cfs, util_dl, max, util;
+
+	cpufreq_get_sched_util(cpu->cpu, &util_cfs, &util_dl, &max);
+	util = min(util_cfs + util_dl, max);
+	return util * 100 / max;
+}
+
 static inline void intel_pstate_update_util_hwp(struct update_util_data *data,
 						u64 time, unsigned int flags)
 {
 	struct cpudata *cpu = container_of(data, struct cpudata, update_util);
 
-	if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT) {
+	if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_MIGRATION) {
+		if (intel_pstate_check_boost_threhold(cpu))
+			cpu->migrate_hint = true;
+
+		cpu->last_update = time;
+		/*
+		 * The rq utilization data is not migrated yet to the new CPU
+		 * rq, so wait for call on local CPU to boost.
+		 */
+		if (smp_processor_id() != cpu->cpu)
+			return;
+	} else if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT) {
 		/*
 		 * Set iowait_boost flag and update time. Since IO WAIT flag
 		 * is set all the time, we can't just conclude that there is
@@ -1499,6 +1523,17 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_update_util_hwp(struct update_util_data *data,
 			intel_pstate_hwp_boost_up(cpu);
 		else
 			smp_call_function_single_async(cpu->cpu, &cpu->csd);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/* Ignore if the migrated thread has low utilization */
+	if (cpu->migrate_hint && smp_processor_id() == cpu->cpu) {
+		int util = intel_pstate_get_sched_util(cpu);
+
+		if (util >= hwp_boost_threshold_busy_pct) {
+			cpu->hwp_boost_active = true;
+			intel_pstate_hwp_boost_up(cpu);
+		}
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.9.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-16  4:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-16  4:49 [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 00/10] Intel_pstate: HWP Dynamic performance boost Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 01/10] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  9:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16  4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 02/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Conditional frequency invariant accounting Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  7:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16  7:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16  9:07       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-16 17:32         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 15:19   ` Juri Lelli
2018-05-16 15:47     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 16:31       ` Juri Lelli
2018-05-17 10:59         ` Juri Lelli
2018-05-17 15:04           ` Juri Lelli
2018-05-17 15:41             ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-17 16:16               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-17 16:42                 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-17 16:56                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-17 18:28                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-18  7:36                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-18 10:57                       ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-18 11:29                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-18 13:33                           ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-30 16:57                             ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-18 14:09                           ` Valentin Schneider
2018-05-16 15:58     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 03/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Utility functions to boost HWP performance limits Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  7:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16  9:15     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-16 10:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 15:39         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 15:41     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 04/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add update_util_hook for HWP Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 05/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: HWP boost performance on IO Wake Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  7:37   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 17:55     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-17  8:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16  9:45   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-16 19:28     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 06/10] cpufreq / sched: Add interface to get utilization values Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  6:40   ` Viresh Kumar
2018-05-16 22:25     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  8:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 22:40     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-17  7:50       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16  4:49 ` Srinivas Pandruvada [this message]
2018-05-16  9:49   ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 07/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: HWP boost performance on busy task migrate Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-16 20:59     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 08/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Dyanmically update busy pct Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  7:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16  7:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16  4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 09/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: New sysfs entry to control HWP boost Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 10/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: enable boost for SKX Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  7:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 15:46     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 15:54       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-17  0:52         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  6:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 00/10] Intel_pstate: HWP Dynamic performance boost Juri Lelli
2018-05-16 15:43   ` Srinivas Pandruvada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180516044911.28797-8-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).