From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Quentin Perret Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/10] Energy Aware Scheduling Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:29:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20180601092933.GA3082@e108498-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20180521142505.6522-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180521142505.6522-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: peterz@infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, chris.redpath@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, thara.gopinath@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, tkjos@google.com, joelaf@google.com, smuckle@google.com, adharmap@quicinc.com, skannan@quicinc.com, pkondeti@codeaurora.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, edubezval@gmail.com, srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, currojerez@riseup.net, javi.merino@kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi, The main new feature of this patch-set is the Energy Model framework we discussed at OSPM. The core of it and the APIs are all implemented in patch 03/10, so this is really where I was hoping to get some feedback. Is the overall idea of this framework reasonable ? What do you think about the interfaces ? Is the new config option acceptable ? And also, is there any way I can make reviewing this patch easier ? Thanks! Quentin