From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] powercap/drivers/idle_injection: Add an idle injection framework Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 14:30:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20180612123036.GJ12180@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1528804816-32636-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1528804816-32636-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Eduardo Valentin , Javi Merino , Leo Yan , Kevin Wangtao , Vincent Guittot , Rui Zhang , Daniel Thompson , Andrea Parri List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 02:00:11PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > +static void __idle_injection_wakeup(struct idle_injection_device *ii_dev) > +{ > + struct idle_injection_thread *iit; > + struct cpumask tmp; > + unsigned int cpu; > + > + cpumask_and(&tmp, ii_dev->cpumask, cpu_online_mask); You should not be having a cpumask on the stack. Those things can be ginormous.