From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@amazon.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"mike.travis@hpe.com" <mike.travis@hpe.com>,
Rajvi Jingar <rajvi.jingar@intel.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] x86: tsc: avoid system instability in hibernation
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 10:53:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180730085354.GA2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180726155656.14873-1-eduval@amazon.com>
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 08:56:56AM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> System instability are seen during resume from hibernation when system
> is under heavy CPU load. This is due to the lack of update of sched
> clock data
Which would suggest you're already running with unstable sched clock.
Otherwise nobody would care about the scd stuff.
What kind of machine are you running? What does:
dmesg | grep -i tsc
say?
> The fix for this situation is to mark the sched clock as unstable
> as early as possible in the resume path, leaving it unstable
> for the duration of the resume process. This will force the
> scheduler to attempt to align the sched clock across CPUs using
> the delta with time of day, updating sched clock data. In a post
> hibernation event, we can then mark the sched clock as stable
> again, avoiding unnecessary syncs with time of day on systems
> in which TSC is reliable.
None of this makes any sense. Either you were already unstable and it
should already have worked and them marking it stable is an outright
bug, or your sched clock was stable but then your initial diagnosis of
lack of scd updates is complete garbage.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-30 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-26 15:56 [PATCH RESEND 1/1] x86: tsc: avoid system instability in hibernation Eduardo Valentin
2018-07-30 7:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-30 16:44 ` Eduardo Valentin
2018-07-30 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-07-30 16:41 ` Eduardo Valentin
2018-07-30 19:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180730085354.GA2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=eduval@amazon.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.travis@hpe.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rajvi.jingar@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox