From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Bellasi Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] sched/core: uclamp: extend sched_setattr to support utilization clamping Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 09:39:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20180809083947.2ogkudkpg6d52roc@darkstar> References: <20180806163946.28380-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20180806163946.28380-2-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Randy Dunlap Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Tejun Heo , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Vincent Guittot , Paul Turner , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes , Steve Muckle , Suren Baghdasaryan List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 06-Aug 09:50, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Hi, Hi Randy, > On 08/06/2018 09:39 AM, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig > > index 041f3a022122..1d45a6877d6f 100644 > > --- a/init/Kconfig > > +++ b/init/Kconfig > > @@ -583,6 +583,25 @@ config HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK > > config GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK > > bool > > > > +menu "Scheduler features" > > + > > +config UCLAMP_TASK > > + bool "Enable utilization clamping for RT/FAIR tasks" > > + depends on CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL > > + default false > > default n > but just omit the line completely since "n" is already the default. Right, will update for next posting! Is there a strict rule to omit this line when it's already the default? > > > + help > > + This feature enables the scheduler to track the clamped utilization > > + of each CPU based on RUNNABLE tasks currently scheduled on that CPU. > > + > > + When this option is enabled, the user can specify a min and max CPU > > + bandwidth which is allowed for a task. > > + The max bandwidth allows to clamp the maximum frequency a task can > > + use, while the min bandwidth allows to define a minimum frequency a > > + task will always use. > > Please clean up the indentation above to use one tab + 2 spaces on all lines. Sure, my bad I did not notice it... although I'm quite sure the patch passed a checkpatch... will check better next time. > > + > > + If in doubt, say N. > > + > > +endmenu Cheers Patrick -- #include Patrick Bellasi