From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Bellasi Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/16] sched/core: uclamp: map TASK's clamp values into CPU's clamp groups Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 18:42:09 +0100 Message-ID: <20180912174209.GI1413@e110439-lin> References: <20180828135324.21976-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20180828135324.21976-3-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20180912162427.GA24106@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180912162427.GA24106@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Tejun Heo , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Vincent Guittot , Paul Turner , Quentin Perret , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes , Steve Muckle , Suren Baghdasaryan List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 12-Sep 18:24, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 02:53:10PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > static inline int __setscheduler_uclamp(struct task_struct *p, > > const struct sched_attr *attr) > > But large for inline now. Yes, Suren also already pointed that out... already gone in my v5 ;) > > { > > + int group_id[UCLAMP_CNT] = { UCLAMP_NOT_VALID }; > > + int lower_bound, upper_bound; > > + struct uclamp_se *uc_se; > > + int result = 0; > > I think the thing would become much more readable if you set > lower/upper_bound right here. Do you mean the bits I've ---8<---ed below ? > > > > + mutex_lock(&uclamp_mutex); > > > > + /* Find a valid group_id for each required clamp value */ > > + if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP_MIN) { ---8<--- > > + upper_bound = (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP_MAX) > > + ? attr->sched_util_max > > + : p->uclamp[UCLAMP_MAX].value; > > + > > + if (upper_bound == UCLAMP_NOT_VALID) > > + upper_bound = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE; > > + if (attr->sched_util_min > upper_bound) { > > + result = -EINVAL; > > + goto done; > > + } ---8<--- Actually it could also make sense to have them before the mutex ;) > > + > > + result = uclamp_group_find(UCLAMP_MIN, attr->sched_util_min); > > + if (result == -ENOSPC) { > > + pr_err(UCLAMP_ENOSPC_FMT, "MIN"); > > AFAICT this is an unpriv part of the syscall; and you can spam the log > without limits. Not good. Good point, will better check this. [...] Cheers, Patrick -- #include Patrick Bellasi