From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Quentin Perret Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/14] sched/topology: Reference the Energy Model of CPUs when available Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 14:16:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20181002131657.7lysubukna4tkjly@queper01-lin> References: <20180912091309.7551-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> <20180912091309.7551-7-quentin.perret@arm.com> <20181002123617.GB3439@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181002123617.GB3439@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mingo@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, chris.redpath@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, thara.gopinath@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, tkjos@google.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, smuckle@google.com, adharmap@codeaurora.org, skannan@codeaurora.org, pkondeti@codeaurora.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, edubezval@gmail.com, srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, currojerez@riseup.net, javi.merino@kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 02 Oct 2018 at 14:36:17 (+0200), Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:13:01AM +0100, Quentin Perret wrote: > > +struct perf_domain { > > + struct em_perf_domain *obj; > > + struct perf_domain *next; > > + struct rcu_head rcu; > > +}; > > Maybe s/obj/em_pd/ or something like that? @obj is so very opaque. I wanted to avoid calling it just 'pd' since that could be confusing. So anything different than that is fine by me. I don't have a better suggestion than 'em_pd', so I'd say let's stick with that for now. Thanks, Quentin