From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: [PATCH 4/5] thermal: st: st_thermal: simplify getting .driver_data Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:00:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20181021200053.2194-5-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> References: <20181021200053.2194-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181021200053.2194-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang , Zhang Rui , Eduardo Valentin , Daniel Lezcano , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org We should get 'driver_data' from 'struct device' directly. Going via platform_device is an unneeded step back and forth. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang --- Build tested only. buildbot is happy. drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal.c index be637e6b01d2..b2bbdf6eb02b 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal.c @@ -277,8 +277,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(st_thermal_unregister); #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP static int st_thermal_suspend(struct device *dev) { - struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); - struct st_thermal_sensor *sensor = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct st_thermal_sensor *sensor = dev_get_drvdata(dev); return st_thermal_sensor_off(sensor); } @@ -286,8 +285,7 @@ static int st_thermal_suspend(struct device *dev) static int st_thermal_resume(struct device *dev) { int ret; - struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); - struct st_thermal_sensor *sensor = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct st_thermal_sensor *sensor = dev_get_drvdata(dev); ret = st_thermal_sensor_on(sensor); if (ret) -- 2.19.0