From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
quentin.perret@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Douglas.Raillard@arm.com, "4 . 20" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: scpi/scmi: Fix freeing of dynamic OPPs
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 11:01:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190104110142.GA28483@e107155-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7dddbeabb434225d9b3d02600ea4a2313622ca26.1546594910.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 03:14:33PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Since the commit 2a4eb7358aba ("OPP: Don't remove dynamic OPPs from
> _dev_pm_opp_remove_table()"), dynamically created OPP aren't
> automatically removed anymore by dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table(). This
> affects the scpi and scmi cpufreq drivers which no longer free OPPs on
> failures or on invocations of the policy->exit() callback.
>
> Create a generic OPP helper dev_pm_opp_remove_all_dynamic() which can be
> called from these drivers instead of dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table().
>
> In dev_pm_opp_remove_all_dynamic(), we need to make sure that the
> opp_list isn't getting accessed simultaneously from other parts of the
> OPP core while the helper is freeing dynamic OPPs, i.e. we can't drop
> the opp_table->lock while traversing through the OPP list. And to
> accomplish that, this patch also creates _opp_kref_release_unlocked()
> which can be called from this new helper with the opp_table lock already
> held.
>
I did test it but since I couldn't reproduce the original issue, my
tested-by is not that worth. Anyways the changes look fine to me.
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-04 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-20 15:27 [BUG] dev_pm_opp refcount issue on Arm Juno r0 Valentin Schneider
2019-01-03 7:05 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-03 10:33 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-01-03 10:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-03 10:41 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-01-04 9:44 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: scpi/scmi: Fix freeing of dynamic OPPs Viresh Kumar
2019-01-04 10:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-01-04 10:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-04 10:40 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-01-04 11:01 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2019-01-11 10:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190104110142.GA28483@e107155-lin \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=Douglas.Raillard@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).