From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eugeniu Rosca Subject: Re: How to remove warn msg "cache: parent cpui should not be sleeping" i=1, 2, 3... Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:07:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20190125130701.GA855@vmlxhi-102.adit-jv.com> References: <20181002170754.GA10240@vmlxhi-102.adit-jv.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181002170754.GA10240@vmlxhi-102.adit-jv.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Sudeep Holla Cc: Jisheng Zhang , Steve Longerbeam , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Eugeniu Rosca , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Eugeniu Rosca , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Joshua Frkuska List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi Sudeep, On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 07:07:54PM +0200, Eugeniu Rosca wrote: > Hello Sudeep, > > I too experience the "cache: parent cpuN should not be sleeping" and > confirm these are healed with your patch. Would it be possible to have > the patch submitted for review? Doing some s2ram testing on R-Car H3 Salvator-X using v5.0-rc3-130-gd73aba1115cf, I am still able to reproduce these warnings. Is there any chance you push the patch to the mailing list? If not, can it be taken with a different authorship by mentioning this discussion thread as source of inspiration? > Thank you very much, > Eugeniu.