From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Quentin Perret Subject: [PATCH v4 3/5] cpufreq: scpi: Register an Energy Model Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 11:09:50 +0000 Message-ID: <20190204110952.16025-4-quentin.perret@arm.com> References: <20190204110952.16025-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190204110952.16025-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: viresh.kumar@linaro.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, nm@ti.com, sboyd@kernel.org, mka@chromium.org Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, quentin.perret@arm.com List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Now that PM_OPP provides a helper function to estimate the power consumed by CPUs, make sure to try and register an Energy Model (EM) from scpi-cpufreq, hence ensuring interested subsystems (the task scheduler, for example) can make use of that information when available. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret --- drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c index 99449738faa4..b279f94d82f7 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c @@ -170,6 +170,9 @@ static int scpi_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = latency; policy->fast_switch_possible = false; + + dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(policy->cpus); + return 0; out_free_cpufreq_table: -- 2.20.1