From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: kjlu@umn.edu, pakki001@umn.edu,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] base: fix a missing check of clk_prepare
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:24:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211132406.GB11067@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0iJCaCju7sgCF9u7PYxmHF0jQDy95_QEVt8q+R2NX5zAA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2281 bytes --]
On Tue 2019-01-01 22:05:39, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 9:21 PM Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue 2019-01-01 21:13:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 6:25 PM Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed 2018-12-26 10:37:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 3:47 AM Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > clk_prepare() could fail, so let's check its status, and if it fails,
> > > > > > issue an error message.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c | 4 +++-
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c b/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
> > > > > > index 5a42ae4078c2..cb6144fb24e2 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
> > > > > > @@ -65,7 +65,9 @@ static void pm_clk_acquire(struct device *dev, struct pm_clock_entry *ce)
> > > > > > if (IS_ERR(ce->clk)) {
> > > > > > ce->status = PCE_STATUS_ERROR;
> > > > > > } else {
> > > > > > - clk_prepare(ce->clk);
> > > > > > + if (clk_prepare(ce->clk))
> > > > > > + dev_err(dev, "clk_prepare failed.\n");
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure that this is useful. The code continues regardless of
> > > > > the error anyway and it should at least set ce->status to
> > > > > PCE_STATUS_ERROR in the failing case.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe this is not complete fix, but dev_err() is preferable to silent
> > > > failure.
> > >
> > > Preferable to you I suppose?
> >
> > Preferable to the poor person trying to figure out why his machine
> > does not work?
>
> Not really, unless that person knows what the message means.
>
> Honestly, what would you do if you saw that message?
Grep it in the kernel sources. Having something to grep for
(vs. machine that fails to work properly) is quite important.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-11 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-26 2:47 [PATCH] base: fix a missing check of clk_prepare Kangjie Lu
2018-12-26 9:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-12-31 17:25 ` Pavel Machek
2019-01-01 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-01-01 20:21 ` Pavel Machek
2019-01-01 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-11 13:24 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190211132406.GB11067@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kjlu@umn.edu \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pakki001@umn.edu \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).