From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-pm <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v1] x86/apic: Reduce print level of CPU limit announcement
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:36:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190327113628.GS22899@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190327111452.GC32571@zn.tnic>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1052 bytes --]
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:14:52PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:50:24PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > It is how we are internally running verification and development,
> > with KERN_DEBUG level, we need it to catch bugs.
>
> And what is the big deal with seeing those messages? Why are *exactly*
> those two such a big problem and the gazillion other debug messages are
> fine?
At the end, it is reduced to our usage, we are running QEMU inside
docker to test kernel changes with limitation on number of CPUs to use.
The systems are optimized to boot kernel as soon as possible in order
to run tests and on my machine (64 CPUs) reduce is visible: from ~2.6
sec to ~2.3 sec from execution to kernel boot.
>
> > This "some config option" is dynamic debug prints and most probably it
> > is enabled in your or any kernel developer in the world.
>
> I personally don't use it because it only gets in the way.
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-27 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-27 9:09 [PATCH -next v1] x86/apic: Reduce print level of CPU limit announcement Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-27 9:17 ` Joe Perches
2019-03-27 9:38 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-27 9:49 ` Joe Perches
2019-03-27 9:53 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-27 10:11 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-27 10:17 ` Joe Perches
2019-03-27 10:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-27 10:50 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-27 11:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-27 11:36 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2019-03-27 11:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-27 11:58 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190327113628.GS22899@mtr-leonro.mtl.com \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox