From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Quentin Perret Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] PM / EM: Expose perf domain struct Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 09:23:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20190515082318.7993-3-quentin.perret@arm.com> References: <20190515082318.7993-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190515082318.7993-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: edubezval@gmail.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, javi.merino@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, amit.kachhap@gmail.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com, mka@chromium.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, quentin.perret@arm.com List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org In the current state, the perf_domain struct is fully defined only when CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL=y. Since we need to write code that compiles both with or without that option in the thermal framework, make sure to actually define the struct regardless of the config option. That allows to avoid using stubbed accessor functions all the time in code paths that use the EM. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret --- include/linux/energy_model.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h index aa027f7bcb3e..fb32b86a467d 100644 --- a/include/linux/energy_model.h +++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ #include #include -#ifdef CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL /** * em_cap_state - Capacity state of a performance domain * @frequency: The CPU frequency in KHz, for consistency with CPUFreq @@ -40,6 +39,7 @@ struct em_perf_domain { unsigned long cpus[0]; }; +#ifdef CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL #define EM_CPU_MAX_POWER 0xFFFF struct em_data_callback { @@ -160,7 +160,6 @@ static inline int em_pd_nr_cap_states(struct em_perf_domain *pd) } #else -struct em_perf_domain {}; struct em_data_callback {}; #define EM_DATA_CB(_active_power_cb) { } -- 2.21.0 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A41C04E84 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:23:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05CC20881 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726645AbfEOIXo (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2019 04:23:44 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:37984 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726590AbfEOIXe (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2019 04:23:34 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E1015AD; Wed, 15 May 2019 01:23:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from queper01-lin.cambridge.arm.com (queper01-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.195.48]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8702B3F703; Wed, 15 May 2019 01:23:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Quentin Perret To: edubezval@gmail.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, javi.merino@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, amit.kachhap@gmail.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com, mka@chromium.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, quentin.perret@arm.com Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] PM / EM: Expose perf domain struct Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 09:23:17 +0100 Message-Id: <20190515082318.7993-3-quentin.perret@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190515082318.7993-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> References: <20190515082318.7993-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <20190515082317.La_NLS_plwIDkEQLiLLvf7o5DMIMrC73yBGPhR3wmNQ@z> In the current state, the perf_domain struct is fully defined only when CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL=y. Since we need to write code that compiles both with or without that option in the thermal framework, make sure to actually define the struct regardless of the config option. That allows to avoid using stubbed accessor functions all the time in code paths that use the EM. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret --- include/linux/energy_model.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h index aa027f7bcb3e..fb32b86a467d 100644 --- a/include/linux/energy_model.h +++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ #include #include -#ifdef CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL /** * em_cap_state - Capacity state of a performance domain * @frequency: The CPU frequency in KHz, for consistency with CPUFreq @@ -40,6 +39,7 @@ struct em_perf_domain { unsigned long cpus[0]; }; +#ifdef CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL #define EM_CPU_MAX_POWER 0xFFFF struct em_data_callback { @@ -160,7 +160,6 @@ static inline int em_pd_nr_cap_states(struct em_perf_domain *pd) } #else -struct em_perf_domain {}; struct em_data_callback {}; #define EM_DATA_CB(_active_power_cb) { } -- 2.21.0