public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] cpuidle: Consolidate disabled state checks
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:03:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190904130316.GR2332@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2136682.Ujdk25Y4fk@kreacher>

On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 12:41:23PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> There are two reasons why CPU idle states may be disabled: either
> because the driver has disabled them or because they have been
> disabled by user space via sysfs.
> 
> In the former case, the state's "disabled" flag is set once during
> the initialization of the driver and it is never cleared later (it
> is read-only effectively).  In the latter case, the "disable" field
> of the given state's cpuidle_state_usage struct is set and it may be
> changed via sysfs.  Thus checking whether or not an idle state has
> been disabled involves reading these two flags every time.
> 
> In order to avoid the additional check of the state's "disabled" flag
> (which is effectively read-only anyway), use the value of it at the
> init time to set a (new) flag in the "disable" field of that state's
> cpuidle_state_usage structure and use the sysfs interface to
> manipulate another (new) flag in it.  This way the state is disabled
> whenever the "disable" field of its cpuidle_state_usage structure is
> nonzero, whatever the reason, and it is the only place to look into
> to check whether or not the state has been disabled.

Yay! That double disable stuff always confused me mightily. This seems
like a sensible solution for it.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-04 13:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-04 10:41 [RFC][PATCH] cpuidle: Consolidate disabled state checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-09-04 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-09-04 21:54 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-20 16:14 ` Doug Smythies

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190904130316.GR2332@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox