* runtime pm without pci or platform subsystem involvement
@ 2020-04-01 14:54 Alex Deucher
2020-04-23 19:52 ` Alex Deucher
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alex Deucher @ 2020-04-01 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux PM
Hi,
I would like to be able to use the runtime pm infrastructure to
support additional power savings at runtime for a PCIe device, but for
various reasons, I need to keep the device in D0. I don't want the
PCI or platform subsystem to put the device into D3hot/cold. Is this
possible? If so how? I'd like to avoid spinning my own variant of
runtime pm just to support this feature.
Thanks,
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: runtime pm without pci or platform subsystem involvement
2020-04-01 14:54 runtime pm without pci or platform subsystem involvement Alex Deucher
@ 2020-04-23 19:52 ` Alex Deucher
2020-04-23 20:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alex Deucher @ 2020-04-23 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux PM, Linux PCI, Bjorn Helgaas, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 10:54 AM Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to be able to use the runtime pm infrastructure to
> support additional power savings at runtime for a PCIe device, but for
> various reasons, I need to keep the device in D0. I don't want the
> PCI or platform subsystem to put the device into D3hot/cold. Is this
> possible? If so how? I'd like to avoid spinning my own variant of
> runtime pm just to support this feature.
Expanding the audience a bit. Is what I want to do possible? Just
want to make sure I don't re-invent something that already exists.
Thanks,
Alex
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: runtime pm without pci or platform subsystem involvement
2020-04-23 19:52 ` Alex Deucher
@ 2020-04-23 20:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2020-04-23 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Deucher; +Cc: Linux PM, Linux PCI, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 03:52:17PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 10:54 AM Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I would like to be able to use the runtime pm infrastructure to
> > support additional power savings at runtime for a PCIe device, but for
> > various reasons, I need to keep the device in D0. I don't want the
> > PCI or platform subsystem to put the device into D3hot/cold. Is this
> > possible? If so how? I'd like to avoid spinning my own variant of
> > runtime pm just to support this feature.
If you clear pdev->pm_cap as in 434fdb51513b ("drm/nouveau: workaround
runpm fail by disabling PCI power management on certain intel
bridges"), we'll assume the device doesn't support any PCI power
management, which means the PCI core should leave the device in D0.
D3cold is handled by ACPI or other platform means. I don't know how
to disable that part.
Bjorn
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-23 20:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-04-01 14:54 runtime pm without pci or platform subsystem involvement Alex Deucher
2020-04-23 19:52 ` Alex Deucher
2020-04-23 20:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).