Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Todd E Brandt <todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Revert "cpu/hotplug: Ignore pm_wakeup_pending() for disable_nonboot_cpus()"
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 13:32:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200429123236.7iqeon4emnlriyc4@e107158-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0gesatUBMdt0c30tg34mTeFOon=7ntzQq88=tfJLy8CtA@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/29/20 12:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:29 PM Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 04/26/20 17:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > I would do this the other way around:
> > >
> > > 1. Make x86 call freeze_secondary_cpus() directly, rename
> > >    enable_nonboot_cpus() and drop disable_nonboot_cpus().
> >
> > All of this in a single patch?
> 
> Well, why not?

I don't mind, was just clarifying. Usually it's requested to split patches :)

> 
> Calling freeze_secondary_cpus() directly causes disable_nonboot_cpus()
> to be unused (and so it can be dropped in the same patch) and it also
> introduces a name mismatch between freeze_ and enable_, which IMO
> needs to be addressed right away (also in the same patch).
> 
> > > 2. Get rid of __freeze_secondary_cpus().
> >
> > I guess you're implying to drop the revert too and manually unroll it instead.
> 
> IMO the revert is just an extra step with no real value, so why do it?

Works for me. Will send v2 ASAP.

Thanks

--
Qais Yousef

      reply	other threads:[~2020-04-29 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-09 11:27 [PATCH 1/3] Revert "cpu/hotplug: Ignore pm_wakeup_pending() for disable_nonboot_cpus()" Qais Yousef
2020-04-09 11:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpu/hotplug: Remove disable_nonboot_cpus() Qais Yousef
2020-04-09 11:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpu/hotplug: Rename enable_nonboot_cpus() Qais Yousef
2020-04-26 15:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] Revert "cpu/hotplug: Ignore pm_wakeup_pending() for disable_nonboot_cpus()" Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-04-27 10:29   ` Qais Yousef
2020-04-29 10:40     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-04-29 12:32       ` Qais Yousef [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200429123236.7iqeon4emnlriyc4@e107158-lin \
    --to=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox