From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263F2C38A2A for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 13:21:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0705424967 for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 13:21:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="QF9qhyvg" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730580AbgEHNVf (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2020 09:21:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37290 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729183AbgEHNVe (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2020 09:21:34 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x444.google.com (mail-wr1-x444.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::444]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80974C05BD43 for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 06:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x444.google.com with SMTP id z8so1823584wrw.3 for ; Fri, 08 May 2020 06:21:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=EdCijOczIQMLs1X4cAiihh7qwIxfmO/FmCoXMHIAt4I=; b=QF9qhyvg3Qeb+YdknO2fao+XlPzsK19K/rtqFb+isyApE2gUA67kAJtCEbpFlaMbpL dcijhFnjRYwsGrSpYFEdti57I43KZ8UJ0e+M60tBa2Gbm3/cm8H7yiqCqG6EY0EgxY1C BeU3J+n0cXh29+FgY+fqG/ymytpuJWNTQHSnllJBQmDNb7rHv3lAlxjwr0etXAa2ptFB 7g7oPs/+taioniIBI29hoil0gYL0DZVP0rgSC2ri1qjfbIcpf1DDmjD0eszCHTKT00WF k43oRpf8CYrDjieni9DUKpnnVMOxSLg06KLLhPJKXzpr0eyaH1TlvS1MwzQJLpAvAysn YYTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=EdCijOczIQMLs1X4cAiihh7qwIxfmO/FmCoXMHIAt4I=; b=qT69PORpwvnbUpIGxm/KMU2idq6X+N0KN5h/ow+uYr/nzAMNYAfn+ZeA/PrKB24zvr HFctNmEo88LGul2GLENuif948PpKUKhw2+vwF70fdKBGhBSvekrPdU9ZpUuhZmm4YWlE Fmgu0d5jqmyjtxQLdeUZ19LlUUp5vyyg6HRFret/zpM2MHkj1vqHMCIRkw51az0usuAN eGWbWHOelbnI0j3IifB1yl+CoSUMnzhpTG1XdeT5kgKLNFdeM1kuvSQ07KTCz0t/Jd10 10mRg6RnHj2oUU4DdlbtcV5+wjO1Kfa52H6BOd+o3ksWDqOq5k6/VGP6LSpNM+rQ6Jxh 532w== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZ+Vi5abVi4nkWg5jwGaB/nOrPoW3Ucji2iKTXGjIF3+JJe8ygR pTYG7Q6u0EOQARKyHaK1dC9bog== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI1o0GT8qsdRugAQfihzVy7cdudanFaAiRDCAYBqFxUeH6OF3tVH8JjYsz1IbNVzkpokawI1w== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5490:: with SMTP id h16mr2920378wrv.250.1588944093030; Fri, 08 May 2020 06:21:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2a00:79e0:d:110:d6cc:2030:37c1:9964]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h6sm12871912wmf.31.2020.05.08.06.21.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 08 May 2020 06:21:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 14:21:29 +0100 From: Quentin Perret To: Pavan Kondeti Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, mcgrof@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, yzaikin@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, tkjos@google.com, kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] sched: cpufreq: Use IS_ENABLED() for schedutil Message-ID: <20200508132129.GE10541@google.com> References: <20200507181012.29791-1-qperret@google.com> <20200507181012.29791-14-qperret@google.com> <20200508053053.GG19464@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200508053053.GG19464@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Friday 08 May 2020 at 11:00:53 (+0530), Pavan Kondeti wrote: > > -#if defined(CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL) && defined(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL) > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL) > > /* Build perf. domains: */ > > for (i = 0; i < ndoms_new; i++) { > > for (j = 0; j < n && !sched_energy_update; j++) { > > Now that scheduler does not have any references to schedutil_gov and cpufreq > has want_eas flag, do we need this CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL checks here? Right, they're not absolutely required, but given that sugov is the only one to have 'want_eas' set I guess there is no need to compile that in without it, no? Cheers, Quentin