From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C97C433E1 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 20:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFBB207F9 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 20:02:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591732951; bh=q+5FPsKLA/Z7flE7/7XyBpxYuqDVnTqZREclhjKh1Yg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=BUrru3Yx8K2q84/kix6lNbuwHYLxudDwEzoxpUzUNhJDVznnyph3n8Hp1ST2WO2AK qZ9ax7ILyRJ4h/h7Jhksn4IF7bmAolnuX/Q58kimyEnykOeg8VTDkmUs9MSTab1UXG nFgvIkGcNbO8VqSb1E6AU6VHEbngr6vSRJ1wUVvo= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732500AbgFIUCa (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 16:02:30 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f68.google.com ([209.85.166.68]:45692 "EHLO mail-io1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725926AbgFIUC2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 16:02:28 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f68.google.com with SMTP id y5so24174642iob.12; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 13:02:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=k8Vtkuk+eVaXGU/8rfVJdWcttoiSK9i9poLLXc4pfnw=; b=uUvqEBhR3EXCW+mC25JRkSeAgKuETy/N8Sae6xZgNXUOrjyI0FECNYsbroCECbajXq dCHsQN+UiqSB2fbcx3A787iYg8yTfT7mWo8da9GBGETkj4YQJm65JGV9oAoxyQ5Oxgtq bQcWDmPV3kupCm8l9dCikZ5who4CvhImNKn/oDmgopVnIm2/JKY6eZL6BNwuHsTMi1vo pjdpJZ0uF9myXpxZfS3oTZmZnTsHgwaCYzr/cFcZ5LMuLTWOt509+dnRU+FMjmTcLlY7 GgB0RVqNav5c1Lzgt+r7nZCLxrXymqpid/+XI0rbx1iQWjQ+AEkft6zHrEx6v7vMOLQq zOIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531oX/4IWQc2zMqx67sPN7oilvsD7g4J7eGMnmQ016ZbMiXdRqrZ P0ilHD7QC6YZ1Kjx6OS7ZQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwwjhFBa9o+ou5vR9zbKMqsajdWUO/uk2RF8iJ7Mxb3+utXKh5+R6GmAI2gbaTUyNT6I1quhg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2e96:: with SMTP id m22mr28955927iow.165.1591732947458; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 13:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps15 ([64.188.179.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e184sm7664983iof.44.2020.06.09.13.02.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Jun 2020 13:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 1359505 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 09 Jun 2020 20:02:25 -0000 Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:02:25 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Dmitry Osipenko Cc: Artur =?utf-8?B?xZp3aWdvxYQ=?= , Georgi Djakov , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Thierry Reding , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chanwoo Choi , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Peter De Schrijver , Mikko Perttunen , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, MyungJoo Ham , Jonathan Hunter , Kyungmin Park Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 24/39] dt-bindings: memory: tegra30: Add memory client IDs Message-ID: <20200609200225.GA1359394@bogus> References: <20200607185530.18113-1-digetx@gmail.com> <20200607185530.18113-25-digetx@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200607185530.18113-25-digetx@gmail.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 07 Jun 2020 21:55:15 +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > Each memory client have a unique hardware ID, this patch adds these IDs. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko > --- > include/dt-bindings/memory/tegra30-mc.h | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+) > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.