From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FFEC433DF for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 08:15:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C450322B40 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 08:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="jFS7DMDh" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726262AbgHEIPy (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2020 04:15:54 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51974 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725868AbgHEIPw (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2020 04:15:52 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1231::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED478C06174A; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 01:15:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=O9maNZgxo9jG14qKmejuN27LhV8t5XITkhKE0XSd29E=; b=jFS7DMDh25OL9yC/twevC8JZBM ceBuRQ2PJnyXbv98USNDdcIfSF91o2AdMye0v3SbkljZF1DbjEXBSrV+hOqKiP0ddDHiNynFY0cHw viv7hgykkDIA1XEFjmaFABC+Yk+zQ0Wdx65zLDIaCiU2wG6pthEqj+NytzrffvrnceAs9R94xv8EM HPqT6PrZ/OHdUNFvVH2GD2dMTuIANBTevZQhGIQ4uV8Sl8qzpbo7IbFchKrmglloSXsW8WDM71Npy N8FP3PkXwr1/Jl8Ig1Uc6jhJ/PnCcJFnt8+8XCAKLp9AlPTsLp8+3o8otfz+Nkob62iTQn7PsOSY6 LNilp1Wg==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k3Ea9-00061h-Ha; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 08:15:29 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B958301EE3; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 10:15:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1F7A42C3020ED; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 10:15:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 10:15:23 +0200 From: peterz@infradead.org To: Dongdong Yang Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, yangdongdong@xiaomi.com, yanziily@xiaomi.com, rocking@linux.alibaba.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] sched: Provide USF for the portable equipment. Message-ID: <20200805081523.GN2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <3bbd9a487176a05588e33ff660d4e58efa1fdb10.1596612536.git.yangdongdong@xiaomi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3bbd9a487176a05588e33ff660d4e58efa1fdb10.1596612536.git.yangdongdong@xiaomi.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 03:36:21PM +0800, Dongdong Yang wrote: > +config SCHED_USF > + bool "User Sensitive Factors for Scheduler" > + depends on CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL && FB > + help > + Select this option to enable the adjustment on the cpufreq with > + the user sensitive factors on schedule. It is special for mobile > + devices which more power care and quick response requirement on > + screen on. > + > + If unsure, say N. You're still suffering all the same problems, still NAK. Read carefully: "we do *NOT* do special case hacks" If you keep sending the same stuff over and over, you'll be elegible for an entry in my mailfilter.