From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B69FC433E1 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 19:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300C822B42 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 19:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="NdPdO2Qp" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729151AbgHETx7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2020 15:53:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46394 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725999AbgHEQtS (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2020 12:49:18 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x443.google.com (mail-pf1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::443]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71514C034622 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 06:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x443.google.com with SMTP id 74so14406187pfx.13 for ; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 06:04:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=FnY/wOfG17U2evXDryqB1R65hFqH8w+FrGcWYVmAVPo=; b=NdPdO2Qp3EtI8fJ/6wWI5wjq47zVlVrky1fF0BJcsc0oi+v+TxcjSeukF1xTd60AlU ze58kZphJ5ivGUQndd0DNaxqElFoFtB+aVL/m6+0lxRzFovh+IUBc5GGdqTSWj5ZD6nX zM9xqQxaBSj8UWPJQTuyQIS85hSGP9baInt9emfy6AsYHx+SIsVrlQ9nM/pSibHo383S V/bmYrQIa+r1SIz3NZJtqrka1eHUP/tlV0AdJqsO4QzQUAmpFx6p+zfFcSSrerEespBX IFkPVKqotTiRy1UUrS27cjNsmopQ0iK9pb+ctyPPqdW+1xivubkl9396TMFGOWR1fX4o UjEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=FnY/wOfG17U2evXDryqB1R65hFqH8w+FrGcWYVmAVPo=; b=fx7IQPE9hKzUTX7Ewtk5owZ67a3QeDKh8tmKavVfnPG3fpQlDrvXbd8uDCBSeOV7Ag IWAIHlFytRrLW2SAHFNLkAEGAo+FYtTQRdmA/8VaKjUyURfWTH1klf/1qb9s9lzFsCP3 iGpOCxKhkV28yW3l0xZQERHdCyRG3RTuq8QNTUg2gon/Jz1lUfiu6g0O7ZPIfMJp7YLH WraGA6RDlA0g/sKpAxo64zSeOIS6I2fyrxwQOn2LId56xbWJOIhYlYhQbRoK/7hlputY Kyno3+dEjKQzC+GDTLkJJ/aG5/k+uYzS4AGf1tiOEeEiQIFH1YxaR/z5eRV6WQVvkGPQ PG4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ywp1VOBcC5vzBVRyNig0uyTbh3E4kAW8cEKCDqcazT2YZaGNg yb0AA+Xka9DjUFCtDJLc5PzUMw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7S819oCITEbdX1G81mfh3R1LyaJcjIYWSwKa5durMR8TWUF5eY60q1dM6Mwb+JYswZbrvaA== X-Received: by 2002:a62:7f0e:: with SMTP id a14mr3369514pfd.320.1596632684631; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 06:04:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([223.190.59.99]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n12sm4200840pfj.99.2020.08.05.06.04.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Aug 2020 06:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:34:36 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Lukasz Luba Cc: Florian Fainelli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq statistics retrieved by drivers Message-ID: <20200805130436.3d2g7z2rsdoesuuk@vireshk-mac-ubuntu> References: <20200729151208.27737-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com> <119ce268-18dc-7a4c-b0b2-3a66ff9ff4b0@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <119ce268-18dc-7a4c-b0b2-3a66ff9ff4b0@arm.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 05-08-20, 12:04, Lukasz Luba wrote: > I know that Viresh is going to develop patches and improve these > cpufreq stats framework. Maybe he also had this 'aggregation' in mind. > I will leave it him. I am only going to look at cpufreq's view of stats independently from the firmware. -- viresh