From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83F1C433E2 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A63D221E3 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kemnade.info header.i=@kemnade.info header.b="WVt7qUC3" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726815AbgIJTtA (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:49:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49724 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726683AbgIJTsw (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:48:52 -0400 Received: from mail.andi.de1.cc (mail.andi.de1.cc [IPv6:2a01:238:4321:8900:456f:ecd6:43e:202c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE625C061757; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:48:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kemnade.info; s=20180802; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=2c66nEBP3DnG4HoyZXJPOlNFvLsRVtjflHnzpM04Cds=; b=WVt7qUC3KvQkSyJfCLY4neNlzG 5roByh4wUvdqv/vQ1V2RMcthBqRUdn+vthIURckBn8mMTPbtkU1y84Uxtzb+Kum2q/NTBRrJ4sPOu mAuqdWRs3XovrKECyu+zzODbwxAkJsqvkYslQ+rhNBQOrYsV3zeQSqRtAIX71GfJ2p2U=; Received: from p200300ccff0e43001a3da2fffebfd33a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([2003:cc:ff0e:4300:1a3d:a2ff:febf:d33a] helo=aktux) by mail.andi.de1.cc with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1kGSYb-0007Sl-NR; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:48:34 +0200 Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:48:32 +0200 From: Andreas Kemnade To: Adam Ford Cc: Daniel Lezcano , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Adam Ford-BE , "H. Nikolaus Schaller" , kernel test robot , Tony Lindgren , Russell King , Eduardo Valentin , Keerthy , Zhang Rui , Amit Kucheria , Linux-OMAP , arm-soc , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Enable addition power management Message-ID: <20200910214832.0041b3aa@aktux> In-Reply-To: References: <20200819125925.2119434-1-aford173@gmail.com> <20200910200152.72cc5d9f@aktux> <4770327e-84fb-0543-097c-6525d762a01f@linaro.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:33:13 -0500 Adam Ford wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 2:14 PM Daniel Lezcano > wrote: > > > On 10/09/2020 20:01, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > > On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:59:23 -0500 > > > Adam Ford wrote: > > > > > >> The bandgap sensor can be idled when the processor is too, but it > > >> isn't currently being done, so the power consumption of OMAP3 > > >> boards can elevated if the bangap sensor is enabled. > > >> > > >> This patch attempts to use some additional power management > > >> to idle the clock to the bandgap when not needed. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford > > >> Reported-by: kernel test robot > > >> --- > > >> V2: Fix issue where variable stating the suspend mode isn't being > > >> properly set and cleared. > > >> > > > hmm, it is not in linux-next. Can we expect that for v5.10? > > > > The reason I did not pick this patch is because lkp reported an error on > > it. > > > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=159788472017308&w=2 > > > > > > > That error message shows it's trying to be built with 'sh' cross compiler, > but should be build with an ARM. > > I can run a manual test of the patch against a different branch if > necessary, but I had built and tested it, so I know it worked at one time. > hmm, what about compile-testing without CONFIG_PM_SLEEP? The function definition is guarded by that. So it is not a sh-specific problem. Regards, Andreas