From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA8AC4727F for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:16:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8882076E for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:16:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725823AbgI3KQk (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 06:16:40 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:33328 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725779AbgI3KQk (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 06:16:40 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21B1D6E; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 03:16:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.47.250]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C52A63F70D; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 03:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:16:32 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: Ulf Hansson , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Daniel Lezcano , Lina Iyer , Lukasz Luba , Vincent Guittot , Stephen Boyd , Bjorn Andersson , Benjamin Gaignard , Sudeep Holla , Linux ARM Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update section for cpuidle-psci Message-ID: <20200930101632.GA30186@bogus> References: <20200814123716.61936-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <20200923081106.GA30942@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20200930091254.GA16862@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200930091254.GA16862@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:12:54AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 03:44:53PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 10:11, Lorenzo Pieralisi > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 05:49:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 2:37 PM Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Extend the file pattern to also include cpuidle-psci.h and > > > > > cpuidle-psci-domain.c. Moreover, add myself as a co-maintainer, > > > > > particularly to help with the support for PM domains. > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Sudeep Holla > > > > > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson > > > > > > > > Any objections from the original maintainers? > > > > > > The PSCI driver providing support for platform coordinated idle states > > > (that this patch is targeting AFAICS) does not require more maintainers, > > > that support is complete and Sudeep and I will take care of refactoring > > > and fixes. > > > > > > If the OSI bits in it require a specific maintainer I would prefer those > > > bits to be moved into a specific file and maintainership added > > > _explicitly_ for that file only. > > > > My main concern is that the OSI support (and some related changes for > > genpd) is still being worked upon. The corresponding code deserves to > > be looked after by someone. I offer my help with this. > > All OSI changes can go into cpuidle-psci-domain.c, you can add a > maintainer entry for that. > > > I guess we can split up the code as you suggest, but perhaps another > > way would be to explicitly state my part of the responsibility in > > MAINTAINERS. Along the lines of this: > > > > M: Ulf Hansson # OSI support / PM domains > > > > Would that be okay to you? > > No because there should be no need, as I have already said. If you need > to change cpuidle-psci.c send patches please and we will review them. > I agree and recollect that was the main idea when we moved all the OSI specific PM domain code to separate file. -- Regards, Sudeep