From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647ECC433FE for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 23:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BF923B1A for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 23:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731719AbgLHXdC (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:33:02 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:44530 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731712AbgLHXdC (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:33:02 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0f08002eb81e5fb58e3a10.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0f:800:2eb8:1e5f:b58e:3a10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 2B1CD1EC0541; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 00:32:21 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1607470341; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=h6F5mNIGeKlh0IZESozg0IRBPpPLEFU2sE1qhXqTv/c=; b=o6CE/xXJ1x1btZz3VuWNrah2gnuv5ibCQBc4l3hkjxJmRU0yyET99LNlEX0ibRrUBcyei+ foH1i8DQ94wYXCe1bKjv0Hvl9OwKZ445t2dKdM6Gq7l5YTLW3uCdNt/pWbhi1tpkqN54ja wrM1rQK8Y6k9AD5K9IwHU1i+SEkSfWI= Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 00:32:16 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Punit Agrawal Cc: Wei Huang , rjw@rjwysocki.net, wei.huang2@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Add processor to the ignore PSD override list Message-ID: <20201208233216.GH27920@zn.tnic> References: <20201125144847.3920-1-punitagrawal@gmail.com> <20201125144847.3920-3-punitagrawal@gmail.com> <20201207202610.GG20489@zn.tnic> <20201207223057.GJ20489@zn.tnic> <87a6unq3xv.fsf@stealth> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a6unq3xv.fsf@stealth> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 08:21:48AM +0900, Punit Agrawal wrote: > According to the commit log, acd316248205 seems to be only targeted at > powernow-K8 - No, it is not targeted at powernow-k8 - acpi-cpufreq.c is what is used on AMD hw. He means to make acpi-cpufreq's behavior consistent with powernow-k8. > But if that is not available, the only way we have is to include > systems that have been verified to not need the override You have verified exactly *one* system - yours. Or are you sure that *all* family 0x17, model 0x60, stepping 0x1 machines don't need the override? Also, you still haven't explained what you're trying to fix here. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette