linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
	Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>, Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
	Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] PM: runtime: Fix race getting/putting suppliers at probe
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:56:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210326105619.27570-3-adrian.hunter@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210326105619.27570-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com>

pm_runtime_put_suppliers() must not decrement rpm_active unless the
consumer is suspended. That is because, otherwise, it could suspend
suppliers for an active consumer.

That can happen as follows:

 static int driver_probe_device(struct device_driver *drv, struct device *dev)
 {
	int ret = 0;

	if (!device_is_registered(dev))
		return -ENODEV;

	dev->can_match = true;
	pr_debug("bus: '%s': %s: matched device %s with driver %s\n",
		 drv->bus->name, __func__, dev_name(dev), drv->name);

	pm_runtime_get_suppliers(dev);
	if (dev->parent)
		pm_runtime_get_sync(dev->parent);

 At this point, dev can runtime suspend so rpm_put_suppliers() can run,
 rpm_active becomes 1 (the lowest value).

	pm_runtime_barrier(dev);
	if (initcall_debug)
		ret = really_probe_debug(dev, drv);
	else
		ret = really_probe(dev, drv);

 Probe callback can have runtime resumed dev, and then runtime put
 so dev is awaiting autosuspend, but rpm_active is 2.

	pm_request_idle(dev);

	if (dev->parent)
		pm_runtime_put(dev->parent);

	pm_runtime_put_suppliers(dev);

 Now pm_runtime_put_suppliers() will put the supplier
 i.e. rpm_active 2 -> 1, but consumer can still be active.

	return ret;
 }

Fix by checking the runtime status. For any status other than
RPM_SUSPENDED, rpm_active can be considered to be "owned" by
rpm_[get/put]_suppliers() and pm_runtime_put_suppliers() need do nothing.

Reported-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
Fixes: 4c06c4e6cf63 ("driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage counter imbalance")
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
---
 drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
index 4fde37713c58..fe1dad68aee4 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
@@ -1704,6 +1704,8 @@ void pm_runtime_get_suppliers(struct device *dev)
 void pm_runtime_put_suppliers(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct device_link *link;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	bool put;
 	int idx;
 
 	idx = device_links_read_lock();
@@ -1712,7 +1714,11 @@ void pm_runtime_put_suppliers(struct device *dev)
 				device_links_read_lock_held())
 		if (link->supplier_preactivated) {
 			link->supplier_preactivated = false;
-			if (refcount_dec_not_one(&link->rpm_active))
+			spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->power.lock, flags);
+			put = pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev) &&
+			      refcount_dec_not_one(&link->rpm_active);
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->power.lock, flags);
+			if (put)
 				pm_runtime_put(link->supplier);
 		}
 
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-26 10:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-26 10:56 [PATCH 0/2] PM: runtime: Fix race getting/putting suppliers at probe Adrian Hunter
2021-03-26 10:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM: runtime: Fix ordering in pm_runtime_get_suppliers() Adrian Hunter
2021-03-26 10:56 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2021-03-26 16:42 ` [PATCH 0/2] PM: runtime: Fix race getting/putting suppliers at probe Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210326105619.27570-3-adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=huobean@gmail.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).