Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] thermal: intel: hfi: Minimally initialize the Hardware Feedback Interface

[Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>]

On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 06:22:33PM -0800, srinivas pandruvada wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-01-02 at 13:46 -0800, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 07:43:22PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 4:23 PM Ricardo Neri
> > > <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> [...]
> 
> > > This looks like it may be too general, because HFI is not a
> > > thermal-only thing.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Maybe cal it INTEL_HFI_THERMAL?
> > 
> > True. The *Enhanced* HFI introduces the concept of thread classes
> > [1]. I was
> > planning to wrap this patchset, which parses the HFI table and deals
> > with updates, as INTEL_HFI. The code that deals with classes would be
> > wrapped as INTEL_EHFI.
> > 
> > After this comment, so you still think that INTEL_HFI_THERMAL makes
> > more
> > sense?
> In general most of the configs for Intel thermal is has THERMAL suffix,
> so to be consistent may be add THERMAL also at the end.
> 
> You can still add INTEL_EHFI as a silent config, which user will not
> select. It will be selected by default with INTEL_HFI_THERMAL.

That makes sense to me. I will add the _THERMAL suffix to the config
option.

Thanks and BR,
Ricardo